Collection Two 2025 | South Africa
Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt.
A general dental practitioner was consulted by a young adult patient for extraction of tooth 16. The tooth was symptomatic, and radiographs showed that the lesion was close to the pulp. Consent was obtained for extraction, and the procedure was carried out under local anaesthetic.
During the procedure, the mesiobuccal root became dislodged and was displaced into the maxillary sinus. The member suspected an oroantral communication (OAC) and informed the patient immediately. A periapical radiograph and panoramic scan confirmed the root displacement.
The patient was referred on the same day to a maxillofacial and oral surgeon (MFOS), who scheduled surgical removal. The procedure was successfully carried out a few weeks later.
The patient subsequently wrote to the member expressing concern about the complication and the distress it caused, as well as the unexpected financial burden. The patient also noted difficulty obtaining medical documentation to support the time that needed to be taken off work and requested full reimbursement of the costs they had incurred.
The member contacted Dental Protection shortly after receiving the patient’s complaint. The dentist was reassured that displacement of a root into the sinus is a recognised complication of upper molar extractions and does not, on its own, indicate substandard care.
However, because the patient had experienced distress, financial loss, and had not been expressly warned of the risk of an oroantral communication (OAC), Dental Protection advised that a goodwill reimbursement could be a fair and proportionate way to resolve the matter.
The member was supported in drafting a measured and empathetic response to the patient. Suggested wording acknowledged the patient’s experience without making any admission of liability and offered reimbursement of both the initial consultation and surgical costs.
As a discretionary indemnity organisation, Dental Protection was able to assist the member proactively, without waiting for a formal claim or HPCSA complaint. Support was approved for the member to reimburse the patient and then recover the amount from Dental Protection. This meant the patient was not left out of pocket, and the member’s own finances and reputation were also protected.
The patient accepted the offer, and no further action was taken. The member later confirmed that the matter had been resolved to everyone’s satisfaction.
The member’s prompt recognition of the complication, immediate referral, and willingness to engage constructively with the patient and Dental Protection were instrumental in achieving a swift and amicable resolution. No legal claim or HPCSA complaint followed.
A general dental practitioner was consulted by a young adult patient for extraction of tooth 16. The tooth was symptomatic, and radiographs showed that the lesion was close to the pulp. Consent was obtained for extraction, and the procedure was carried out under local anaesthetic.
During the procedure, the mesiobuccal root became dislodged and was displaced into the maxillary sinus. The member suspected an oroantral communication (OAC) and informed the patient immediately. A periapical radiograph and panoramic scan confirmed the root displacement.
The patient was referred on the same day to a maxillofacial and oral surgeon (MFOS), who scheduled surgical removal. The procedure was successfully carried out a few weeks later.
The patient subsequently wrote to the member expressing concern about the complication and the distress it caused, as well as the unexpected financial burden. The patient also noted difficulty obtaining medical documentation to support the time that needed to be taken off work and requested full reimbursement of the costs they had incurred.
The member contacted Dental Protection shortly after receiving the patient’s complaint. The dentist was reassured that displacement of a root into the sinus is a recognised complication of upper molar extractions and does not, on its own, indicate substandard care.
However, because the patient had experienced distress, financial loss, and had not been expressly warned of the risk of an oroantral communication (OAC), Dental Protection advised that a goodwill reimbursement could be a fair and proportionate way to resolve the matter.
The member was supported in drafting a measured and empathetic response to the patient. Suggested wording acknowledged the patient’s experience without making any admission of liability and offered reimbursement of both the initial consultation and surgical costs.
As a discretionary indemnity organisation, Dental Protection was able to assist the member proactively, without waiting for a formal claim or HPCSA complaint. Support was approved for the member to reimburse the patient and then recover the amount from Dental Protection. This meant the patient was not left out of pocket, and the member’s own finances and reputation were also protected.
The patient accepted the offer, and no further action was taken. The member later confirmed that the matter had been resolved to everyone’s satisfaction.
The member’s prompt recognition of the complication, immediate referral, and willingness to engage constructively with the patient and Dental Protection were instrumental in achieving a swift and amicable resolution. No legal claim or HPCSA complaint followed.
Leave a comment